Requirements that survive the next sprint
BRDs, stories, and workflows treated as product work, not a meeting transcript that only the author can decode.
Requirements · Stories · Acceptance · UAT
A business-analyst hire is not “someone who can take notes in a meeting.” iQud analysts own requirements, acceptance criteria, and sprint-ready backlog items that survive engineering and QA, not a vague brief that the squad has to reverse-engineer.
“Business analyst” is not one job. We match on the discovery surface you need, the same product work behind iQud’s live Software Development page.
BRDs, stories, and workflows treated as product work, not a meeting transcript that only the author can decode.
Edge cases and expected outcomes owned in writing, so QA and engineering argue less about “what we meant.”
Prioritized, sized-enough items with clear asks, not a dump of epics that stall the board.
Validation against the requirements you signed, not a surprise demo that invents new rules mid-cycle.
Business rules, gaps, and trade-offs named early, so product decisions are not buried in Slack threads.
A cadence gap that needs delivery ownership, or a build gap that is really application code, still wants a different hire. We will say so on the intro call instead of forcing a BA-only seat.
Every tile is a live iQud technology or service page. The strip below is the delivery and collaboration stack these analysts already work in (Jira, Slack, and the rest of the project tools around discovery), not a frontend or backend dump.
























A business-analyst hire should be clarifying stories, acceptance criteria, and the next UAT path, not sitting in a two-month onboarding theatre while the brief stays a rumour.
Workflow vs product brief, stakeholders, tools, seniority, overlap hours, and what “clear in 30 days” looks like on requirements and acceptance.
We match available business analysts to your brief and share relevant requirements, backlog, or UAT work.
Meet the human who will join standup. Validate how they talk through an ambiguous workflow, a missing edge case, and the last acceptance criteria they owned past the meeting notes.
Board access, rituals, and a first backlog slice, typically inside a week once you say go.
Most clients embed a single business analyst first. A second seat or a BA/PM split only when the work actually needs it.
A business analyst joins your squad, takes direction from your product owner, and works in your rituals.
Best forClosing a requirements gap without a new vendor process
A stable owner for stories, acceptance criteria, and UAT, with senior review on the sprint.
Best forA product that needs a named discovery owner
A defined slice: a workflow rewrite, a launch backlog, or a UAT pack with contracts already in motion.
Best forA milestone you can point at, not an open-ended notes sandbox
Two ways to staff a business analyst. Hourly for spikes and defined discovery. A dedicated monthly seat when you want someone in your standup every day, at a lower effective rate than running the clock.
$20/ hour
Flexible business-analyst capacity for discovery spikes, backlog cleanups, and scoped UAT. You only pay for hours worked.
Best value
$2,000/ month
A named business analyst on your sprint, about 160 hours of dedicated discovery capacity, with senior review in the cadence.
A full-time month at $20 is $3,200. This seat is $2,000.
Rates are for dedicated business analysts (requirements, stories, acceptance, UAT). Seniority mix and overlap hours are confirmed on the intro call. We will not quote a discovery surface we do not already run.
A mediocre BA hire produces meeting notes that look complete in the call. These analysts produce requirements that survive real builds, real QA, and your next release.
They live in ambiguous workflows, missing edge cases, and why last week’s rework came from a story that never owned its acceptance criteria.
GIFT City overlap with Europe and the US. Discovery reviews happen live when your leads are online.
Mid-level speed without unsupervised docs debt. Review is part of the engagement, not an extra SKU.
We do not run a revolving bench. Capacity is limited so the analyst you interview is the one in standup.
Start with one. Most clients embed a single senior or mid-level business analyst, then add a second seat or a PM if the roadmap justifies it.
All three when they are product work. A requirements seat owns BRDs and workflows. A stories seat owns backlog and acceptance criteria. A UAT seat owns validation against the signed brief. We will only shortlist analysts on discovery surfaces we already run.
That is a project-manager hire, or an engineering hire, not this discovery seat. Say so on the intro call and we will not force a BA profile onto a delivery-only or code-only brief.
After we map the role and you approve the hire, first backlog slices typically land within a week, faster when stakeholders, tools, and existing docs are ready.
Yes. Jira, Confluence or Docs, Figma when needed, your standups. We do not invent a parallel process unless you ask for one.
Hourly ($20) is for spikes and defined discovery. You pay only for hours worked. The monthly seat ($2,000) is a named business analyst on your sprint, about 160 hours of dedicated capacity. The same month billed hourly would be $3,200. Seniority and overlap hours are confirmed on the intro call.

Tell us workflow vs product brief, stakeholders, and the first backlog slice you want owned. We’ll come back with a named profile, a start window, and a two-week plan.